h23 — and what each part has to return to earn its place · built 2026-08-13
| Tool | $/mo | State | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apify Scrapers for LinkedIn engagement and Google Maps. One key, many actors. | $39 | on | Earns it |
| Must return: It is the only source of audience and of local-trade knowledge bases. Nothing else in the stack replaces it, and the Maps path is what fixed the wrong-industry bug. | |||
| GitLeads First pass of email enrichment — the cheap one. | $49 | dry | Not decided |
| Must return: Cody’s worked example finds ~64% of emails here. If it does not clear half, the waterfall below it gets expensive fast. | |||
| Apollo Second pass for whatever GitLeads misses. | $49 | dry | Not decided |
| Must return: Must convert enough of the remainder to beat paying the expensive tool for all of them. Only worth it once volume is real. | |||
| Origami Aggregates the whole waterfall behind one call. | metered | dry | Preferred |
| Must return: Replaces the two above rather than adding to them. Priced per lookup, so it costs nothing until used — which makes it the right first paid enrichment, not the third. | |||
| LeadMagic Mobile numbers. | $99 | dry | Defer |
| Must return: Only if someone is actually going to phone. We are not, yet. | |||
| Million Verifier Grades an address before you send to it. | $37 | dry | Buy with enrichment |
| Must return: Cheap insurance on a thing that is unrecoverable when it goes wrong: send to dead addresses and the domain stops reaching anyone. Buy this the same day we buy any enrichment, never later. | |||
| Instantly Cold-email sending infrastructure. | $97 | dry | Defer |
| Must return: Plus ~$100/mo for burner domains and inboxes. ~$200 all-in for ~10,000 sends. Nothing until we have a list worth sending to and something worth saying. | |||
| HeyReach LinkedIn DMs at volume, via API. | $79 | dry | Defer |
| Must return: Second channel, and only after email has a measured cost per lead to beat. | |||
| Ordinal Multi-account social scheduling with analytics feeding back. | metered | dry | Defer |
| Must return: Agent #2 needs it to close the loop between what was posted and what worked. Not until agent #2 is producing publishable drafts. | |||
| Model API Judgment where judgment is genuinely needed. | metered | dry | Buy when unblocked |
| Must return: Metered, not subscription. Needed for ICP stage 2, campaign copy and reply classification — three places, none of them per-lead. The engine and the whole campaign layer run with no model calls at all, deliberately. | |||
| Item | $/mo | What it carries |
|---|---|---|
| Droplet | $48 | Runs the engine, all ~190 sites, the knowledge bases and the pipeline. Already paid, shared across everything. |
| Postiz droplet | $12 | Separate box for publishing. Already paid. |
$60 a month carries the engine, every site, the knowledge bases and the pipeline. It does not scale with clients, which is the whole reason the unit economics work.
No model calls in the routine path — not in the audit, not in topic selection, not in the campaign layer, not in the creative. That is a deliberate design decision and it is the single largest cost control we have. A per-action model call would put a variable cost under every client and make the $140 tier impossible.
Origami first, because it is priced per lookup rather than per month — it costs nothing until a lead is worth enriching, and it replaces the two-subscription waterfall rather than adding to it. Million Verifier with it, same day, because sending to dead addresses is the one mistake in this stack that cannot be undone. Everything else waits for a measured cost per lead.
At $140 / $280 / $420 a month, a client cannot carry a $200/month tool by themselves. Every paid tool has to be shared across the whole book or it does not go in. That is the actual constraint, and it is why the list above is mostly deferred rather than mostly bought.
It also answers the $100k worry directly: there is no version of this that becomes a $100k system, because there is no component that scales with client count except media spend — and media spend is the client’s, capped by them, and never proposed until the free channels are done.